It is settled that the streets of a city belong to the people of a state and the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen of the state.
Whyte v. City of Sacramento, 65 Cal. App. 534, 547, 224 Pac. 1008, 1013 (1924);  Escobedo v. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 222 Pac.2d 1, 5, 35 Cal.2d 870 (1950).

If you have the "inalienable right" to use the streets, why bother to enter a contract with the DMV and request the "privilege" to "drive" when it is perfectly legal to use the streets in the first place? 

So long as one uses his private property for private purposes and does not devote it to the public use, the public has no interest in it and no voice in its control.
Associated Pipe v. Railroad Commission, 176 Cal. 518 

There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one  because of the exercise of a constitutional  right.
Sherar v. Cullen,  481 F. 945 (9th Cir. 1973)
Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967)
GARRITY v. NEW JERSEY, 385 U.S. 493 (1967)
BOYD v. U S, 116 U.S. 616 (1886
)
MALLOY v. HOGAN, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)

Unless of course "driving" doesn't mean what you think it means.

Are you absolutely positive you "drive"?

Would you have a Driver License if you weren't "required" to?

Ever wonder how you became "required" to?

When you use your car to go from Point A to Point B do you get paid?

Do you use your car for private household purposes or do you use your car where the public benefits from the use of your car?

It is perfectly legal to use your car to go from Point A to Point B, like to work, or the doctor, or the store, or your place of worship or other private or houshold purposes without government permission in the form of a license.

*1.  LICENSES ( 5*) - CHAUFFEURS.

The occupation of a chauffeur is one calling for regulation and therefore permitting a regulatory license tax.

2.  STATUTES ( 81*) - SPECIAL LEGISLATION-CLASSIFICATION.

Dividing, as does St. 1913, p. 639, drivers of automobiles into two classes, one professional chauffeurs, and requiring them to obtain a license, and pay an annual fee of $2, the other embracing all others, who are not required to secure a license or pay a license fee, is sound classification and not arbitrary, so as to constitute special legislation.

"...the two classes... exaction of a license fee from one and not from the other class.."

"...this precise conclusion was adopted by the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Ruggles v. State, 120 Md. 533,  87 Atl. 1080.

* Excerpts from a Supreme Court of California decision, this is standing law!

DRIVER. One employed...
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

DRIVER-- one employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle..."
BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY, (1914) p. 940.

DRIVER. One employed...
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed, 1951

(EMPLOYED  =  using your car to transport passengers or property for hire.  If you don't get "paid" when you use your car, you're not employed within the meaning of the previous definitions.)

Did you place yourself in the wrong class?
 


 

ARE YOU POSITIVE YOU HAVE TO GET A  DRIVER LICENSE?

JUST EXACTLY HOW DID YOU BECOME "OBLIGATED" TO GET A DRIVER LICENSE?

ARE YOU SURE YOUR CAR IS A "MOTOR VEHICLE" OR "VEHICLE" AS DEFINED IN LAW?

DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF "DRIVER" IS?

WOULD YOU REGISTER YOUR CAR IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO?

ARE YOU ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN?

WOULD YOU BET YOUR JOB ON IT?

If you answered "NO" to the last question then proceed  


or

leave in peace and continue to pay the DMV.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.   We ask not your counsels or arms.   Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.   May your chain be set lightly upon you and may posterity forget ye were our countrymen."
Samuel Adams